Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 
 


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 04-03-2019, 11:50 PM   #121
Site Team
 
avanti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,321
Default

What are the plusses?
__________________
Now: 2022 Fully-custom buildout (Ford Transit EcoBoost AWD)
Formerly: 2005 Airstream Interstate (Sprinter 2500 T1N)
2014 Great West Vans Legend SE (Sprinter 3500 NCV3 I4)
avanti is offline  
Old 04-03-2019, 11:56 PM   #122
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 11,914
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by avanti View Post
What are the plusses?

I would guess that the big one would be battery longevity based on what we have heard of the desirability of no float or sitting at full all the time. If the batteries were good at a float or holding of charge voltage, there would be no reason not to do it, I would think. It many also be better for the AGM is the charge sources go off or to float, too, depending on voltage.
booster is offline  
Old 04-04-2019, 05:45 AM   #123
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: California
Posts: 132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregmchugh View Post
In any case, while I am aware that you justifiably have major issues with EHGNA and Jim Hammill, how was the 6 year warranty fictional prior to the point where EHGNA went kaput?
A warranty must bank 5% to 10% of the BOM cost compounded for each year of warranty passed year-one. The precent is chosen based on the MTBF of the components. That formula falls apart if the warranty extends beyond any component's MTBF "bathtub", which is the case for the relays and LiFePo4 cells.

6-years was also doomed since the warranty fund calculation assumes thorough testing already rang out the latent design defects. Clearly testing was left to the customers.
ContinuousImprovement is offline  
Old 04-04-2019, 06:38 AM   #124
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,380
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ContinuousImprovement View Post
A warranty must bank 5% to 10% of the BOM cost compounded for each year of warranty passed year-one. The precent is chosen based on the MTBF of the components. That formula falls apart if the warranty extends beyond any component's MTBF "bathtub", which is the case for the relays and LiFePo4 cells.

6-years was also doomed since the warranty fund calculation assumes thorough testing already rang out the latent design defects. Clearly testing was left to the customers.
All true except in this case the warranty was simply a marketing tool unrelated to actual future costs for warranty coverage. It is pretty clear that EHGNA was not doing business in a financially sound manner isn’t it?
gregmchugh is offline  
Old 04-04-2019, 12:25 PM   #125
Platinum Member
 
Davydd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 5,963
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregmchugh View Post
All true except in this case the warranty was simply a marketing tool unrelated to actual future costs for warranty coverage. It is pretty clear that EHGNA was not doing business in a financially sound manner isn’t it?
That goes without saying. They went under. Could be it was just a pyramid scheme gone awry by EHGNA management too soon before Thor finalized the deal.
__________________
Davydd
2021 Advanced RV 144 custom Sprinter
2015 Advanced RV Extended body Sprinter
2011 Great West Van Legend Sprinter
2005 Pleasure-way Plateau TS Sprinter
Davydd is online now  
Old 04-04-2019, 01:11 PM   #126
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 11,914
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregmchugh View Post
All true except in this case the warranty was simply a marketing tool unrelated to actual future costs for warranty coverage. It is pretty clear that EHGNA was not doing business in a financially sound manner isn’t it?

Many of us have considered the long Roadtrek warranty a marketing tool all along, I think.


The extended battery warranty started even before the lithium batteries were available and appeared to be a reaction to the very poor durability of the etrek AGM systems which was getting a lot of attention and pushback against Roadtrek and Jim Hammill even on the Facebook group. They put in the warranty to try to quiet things down and not kill off sales, which it appears to have worked. The warranty carried on to the lithium systems and expanded to the coach parts as well.


With the well known high failure rate of the battery systems, and reduced coachwork quality, we saw happening, there were many questions raised about if the warranty claims would eventually cause financial issues for Roadtrek. As it turned out, the other bad financial stuff appears to have helped that happen to the point of totally killing off the company, most likely. (Isn't today the day we are supposed to hear something about the sell off?)
booster is offline  
Old 04-04-2019, 01:23 PM   #127
Site Team
 
avanti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,321
Default

To be fair, ALL warranties are predominantly "marketing tools". Manufacturers offer them because they improve sales. That is pretty much the end of the story.

Folks tend to assume that the length of a warranty somehow reflects the quality of the product. This is not generally true. It is common for exactly the same product to be sold with different packaging and different warranties at different price points. It is purely an economic calculation, as the above-mentioned rule-of-thumb illustrates. It is perfectly feasible to offer excellent warranties on crappy products--it is just more expensive.

The problem occurs when the underlying economic model is flawed to the point where the promised services may not be deliverable. This can happen due to financial incompetence, fraud, or technical surprises. I will leave it to others to debate which of these apply here.
__________________
Now: 2022 Fully-custom buildout (Ford Transit EcoBoost AWD)
Formerly: 2005 Airstream Interstate (Sprinter 2500 T1N)
2014 Great West Vans Legend SE (Sprinter 3500 NCV3 I4)
avanti is offline  
Old 04-04-2019, 03:05 PM   #128
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: OR
Posts: 4
Default Ecotrek is not dead. Dealer cost and warranty

Quote:
Originally Posted by chris_g19 View Post
It will be $7,000 dollars to replace both my modules. They can't replace one because module Rev H isn't compatible with Rev G.
Not $7000. Buy a refurbished H and keep your G for parts. Share this dealer cost sheet and negotiate a fair markup from $450.
https://docs.google.com/document/u/4...E14ftBm863/pub
BringBackRoadtrek is offline  
Old 04-09-2019, 06:36 PM   #129
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: San ?Jose
Posts: 39
Default Ecotrek rebuild, drop in replacement

Ok, here I go.

Replacing my EcoTrek with a custom build. Reusing the same cells and battery box for a drop in replacement.

Attached is my super simple schematic. No relays, no battery heaters, virtually no parasitic draw.

Diagnostics via Bluetooth, and parameters programmable via Bluetooth, so I'll have tons of info to post here on the forum.

Expected to complete the project in 4 weeks.
Attached Images
File Type: png 0_20190409110224TinyCad_Zion_SRT_2019_04_09_v1.dsn_.png (24.2 KB, 123 views)
chris_g19 is offline  
Old 04-09-2019, 06:54 PM   #130
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Ontario
Posts: 18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chris_g19 View Post
Ok, here I go.

Replacing my EcoTrek with a custom build. Reusing the same cells and battery box for a drop in replacement.

Attached is my super simple schematic. No relays, no battery heaters, virtually no parasitic draw.

Diagnostics via Bluetooth, and parameters programmable via Bluetooth, so I'll have tons of info to post here on the forum.

Expected to complete the project in 4 weeks.
How much is the Smart BMS costing you? I just bought a REC Active BMS for my setup, which so far has seemed pretty decent and well built. Though I do have some parasitic draw from the relays (About 100mA with just one, so not too terrible.) I need to add up what I spent on the REC, but I believe it was about 600CAD shipped, and with customs fees/duty
silverchris is offline  
Old 04-09-2019, 07:01 PM   #131
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,380
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chris_g19 View Post
Ok, here I go.

Replacing my EcoTrek with a custom build. Reusing the same cells and battery box for a drop in replacement.

Attached is my super simple schematic. No relays, no battery heaters, virtually no parasitic draw.

Diagnostics via Bluetooth, and parameters programmable via Bluetooth, so I'll have tons of info to post here on the forum.

Expected to complete the project in 4 weeks.
Looks good, does the BMS report accurate battery SOC or would it make sense to add a shunt and Victron Battery Meter to get SOC?
gregmchugh is offline  
Old 04-09-2019, 08:48 PM   #132
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: San ?Jose
Posts: 39
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by silverchris View Post
How much is the Smart BMS costing you? I just bought a REC Active BMS for my setup, which so far has seemed pretty decent and well built. Though I do have some parasitic draw from the relays (About 100mA with just one, so not too terrible.) I need to add up what I spent on the REC, but I believe it was about 600CAD shipped, and with customs fees/duty
It was $326 USD shipped from Germany. Google "123 smart BMS"

If you're up for it, get rid of those relays and go with FETs. 100mA for a relay, ~1mA for a FET, plus they will last a lot longer and are much more reliable. I'm using the Victron BP-100 and BP-220 which will take 600 amps peak.

My goal is to go all solid state if possible.
chris_g19 is offline  
Old 04-09-2019, 08:51 PM   #133
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 11,914
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chris_g19 View Post
It was $326 USD shipped from Germany. Google "123 smart BMS"

If you're up for it, get rid of those relays and go with FETs. 100mA for a relay, ~1mA for a FET, plus they will last a lot longer and are much more reliable. I'm using the Victron BP-100 and BP-220 which will take 600 amps peak.

My goal is to go all solid state if possible.

What is the voltage drop on this kind of FET?
booster is offline  
Old 04-09-2019, 09:56 PM   #134
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Ontario
Posts: 18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chris_g19 View Post
It was $326 USD shipped from Germany. Google "123 smart BMS"

If you're up for it, get rid of those relays and go with FETs. 100mA for a relay, ~1mA for a FET, plus they will last a lot longer and are much more reliable. I'm using the Victron BP-100 and BP-220 which will take 600 amps peak.

My goal is to go all solid state if possible.
I didn't realize those could be used that way. I was doing some looking for FET based switching, but couldn't find anything. I ended up grabbing a used Tyco Kilovac EV200AAANA for my load switch, and hadn't selected anything for my charging switch yet. Might be making some design changes now!
silverchris is offline  
Old 04-12-2019, 02:04 AM   #135
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: CA
Posts: 1,668
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregmchugh View Post
When both terminals are connected then everything is connected in parallel, the loads, the chargers, and the AGM. The inverter has been moved around, it seemed to be on the discharge side originally but has been moved to the charge side recently. Since it is both a load when it is inverting and a charger on shore power neither location is ideal.
When the charger is connected to the charge port, if the port senses a fully charged battery condition, it opens the port. Got that. The charger sees no load and consequently quits charging. But isn't the inverter/charger still powered up and why would the 120V pass thru path to the AC panel be inhibited? Even powered down, isn't the transfer relay normally closed?
cruising7388 is offline  
Old 04-12-2019, 02:39 AM   #136
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,380
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cruising7388 View Post
When the charger is connected to the charge port, if the port senses a fully charged battery condition, it opens the port. Got that. The charger sees no load and consequently quits charging. But isn't the inverter/charger still powered up and why would the 120V pass thru path to the AC panel be inhibited? Even powered down, isn't the transfer relay normally closed?
The transfer relay only activates when the inverter is on. When the inverter is off it does nothing, no pass through, no battery charging, no inverting, nothing operates.

Well, the charger will see the AGM battery and charge it even if all the Ecotreks get fully charged and all disconnect the cells from the charge ports.

As long as the inverter is on and connected to shore power then the transfer relay will activate and pass the shore power through to the van.

When inverter was on the load side there was the issue that when all the Ecotreks were disconnected from the load port there was nothing connected to the shore charger and the 12v output was very unstable. Transfer relay was still sending shore power to the van.
gregmchugh is offline  
Old 04-12-2019, 03:56 AM   #137
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: CA
Posts: 1,668
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregmchugh View Post
The transfer relay only activates when the inverter is on. When the inverter is off it does nothing, no pass through, no battery charging, no inverting, nothing operates.

Well, the charger will see the AGM battery and charge it even if all the Ecotreks get fully charged and all disconnect the cells from the charge ports.

As long as the inverter is on and connected to shore power then the transfer relay will activate and pass the shore power through to the van.

When inverter was on the load side there was the issue that when all the Ecotreks were disconnected from the load port there was nothing connected to the shore charger and the 12v output was very unstable. Transfer relay was still sending shore power to the van.
I have to be continually reminded that this inverter has to be on for the charger to operate I don't recall this necessity for my Magnum or Xantrex Prosine 2.0 units. While they were physically integrated, they were electrically independent.

I see that if the inverter/charger is directed to the battery charge port and if this port opens, the charger is still common to both the AGM battery and the 12V distribution panel. Switching the connection to the discharge port does isolate the AGM from the charger if the battery is shut off, but doesn't the charger still see the 12V panel? Why wouldn't the loads from this panel load keep the charger in a stable condition like other modern converters that are typically designed to deliver stable voltage even in the complete absence of a battery? I know that vintage converters (Magnetek 60xx?) needed a battery present because it was necessary for reducing AC ripple to acceptable levels, but at this point isn't this antiquated design ancient history?
cruising7388 is offline  
Old 04-12-2019, 04:25 AM   #138
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,380
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cruising7388 View Post
I have to be continually reminded that this inverter has to be on for the charger to operate I don't recall this necessity for my Magnum or Xantrex Prosine 2.0 units. While they were physically integrated, they were electrically independent.

I see that if the inverter/charger is directed to the battery charge port and if this port opens, the charger is still common to both the AGM battery and the 12V distribution panel. Switching the connection to the discharge port does isolate the AGM from the charger if the battery is shut off, but doesn't the charger still see the 12V panel? Why wouldn't the loads from this panel load keep the charger in a stable condition like other modern converters that are typically designed to deliver stable voltage even in the complete absence of a battery? I know that vintage converters (Magnetek 60xx?) needed a battery present because it was necessary for reducing AC ripple to acceptable levels, but at this point isn't this antiquated design ancient history?
Yes, it is a stupid design to not have the two functions separate...

The 12v distribution is on the load side, not the charge side so it is isolated from the AGM and the battery charger when the inverter is on the charge side.

There are converters that require no battery to provide a stable output and there are chargers that require a battery connected to provide a stable output.

Converters can provide a regulated voltage without the need for connection to a battery but they can also be connected to a battery to charge it.

Chargers typically require a voltage reference from a connected battery in order to get a stable output voltage (loads wouldn’t help here). Without the battery connection and just loads there is an unstable voltage output from the charger.
gregmchugh is offline  
Old 04-12-2019, 06:36 AM   #139
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: CA
Posts: 1,668
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregmchugh View Post
Yes, it is a stupid design to not have the two functions separate...

The 12v distribution is on the load side, not the charge side so it is isolated from the AGM and the battery charger when the inverter is on the charge side.

There are converters that require no battery to provide a stable output and there are chargers that require a battery connected to provide a stable output.

Converters can provide a regulated voltage without the need for connection to a battery but they can also be connected to a battery to charge it.

Chargers typically require a voltage reference from a connected battery in order to get a stable output voltage (loads wouldn’t help here). Without the battery connection and just loads there is an unstable voltage output from the charger.
With the charger connected to the battery charge port, is there a potential for continuous recycling?

1. The charge port senses full charge and opens the port.

2. The inverter shuts down.

3. The charger shuts down and shoreside 120V pass-thru is inhibited.

4. Unless there are active 12V external loads the system remains in this state
until the internal BMS demand drops battery voltage enough to reopen the
charge port.

5. Battery charging resumes at the charge port.

6. Inverter/charger 120V pass-thru to AC loads is restored.

7. The charge port senses full charge and opens the port.

8. Rinse and repeat.
cruising7388 is offline  
Old 04-12-2019, 05:37 PM   #140
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,380
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cruising7388 View Post
With the charger connected to the battery charge port, is there a potential for continuous recycling?

1. The charge port senses full charge and opens the port.

2. The inverter shuts down.

3. The charger shuts down and shoreside 120V pass-thru is inhibited.

4. Unless there are active 12V external loads the system remains in this state
until the internal BMS demand drops battery voltage enough to reopen the
charge port.

5. Battery charging resumes at the charge port.

6. Inverter/charger 120V pass-thru to AC loads is restored.

7. The charge port senses full charge and opens the port.

8. Rinse and repeat.
I am not familiar enough with the RT inverter/charger but what caused the inverter to shut off when the charge ports all disconnected?

I think it will continue to operate with the transfer of shore power to the van and the AGM battery connected to the charger until at some point the BMS reconnects the charge port some of the Ecotreks as they discharge from the 12v loads (and in some vans the secondary inverter for the kitchen which is connected to the load side of the Ecotreks) to the point where the BMS reconnects.
gregmchugh is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.