Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 
 


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 12-20-2018, 10:16 PM   #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: CA
Posts: 10
Default 2007 Roadtrek SS agile

Id like to eventually upgade the battery system in my RV. Is it complicated to replace with a more updates set of batteries? Whats involved?
This SS runs so perfectly except it needs a few more current upgrades.
I heard the 2007 6cylinder is a great motor, feedback?
Max58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2019, 05:08 PM   #2
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 3
Default

You meant 5-cylinder; not 6. That’s what we have in our 2007 Agile SS.
ezdozit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2019, 05:14 PM   #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: CA
Posts: 10
Default

We actually have one of the first 6cyl build in 2007 sold in 2018.
Max58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2019, 05:27 PM   #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 3
Default

Actually, as per RT, our’s a 2006 manufactured Dodge Sprinter converted by RT and sold as 2007. We hear 5-cyl performs better than 6. But, I feel they all perform fairly decent in terms of power and mileage.

We bought ours 2013 with about 14Kmi; now, its peaking up to 80K. We’re still thrilled and hope you’ll enjoy it!
ezdozit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2019, 06:56 PM   #5
Site Team
 
avanti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,339
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ezdozit View Post
We hear 5-cyl performs better than 6.
The 5-cyl does not perform better. It is just that it lacks many of the failure-prone emissions systems that plague the 6.
__________________
Now: 2022 Fully-custom buildout (Ford Transit EcoBoost AWD)
Formerly: 2005 Airstream Interstate (Sprinter 2500 T1N)
2014 Great West Vans Legend SE (Sprinter 3500 NCV3 I4)
avanti is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2019, 07:24 PM   #6
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: California
Posts: 15
Default

In my opinion, the early six-cylinder engines (i.e., 2006 through 200 are optimal. Although they don't deliver the fuel mileage of the five-cylinder, neither do they suffer from failure of the plastic turbo resonator. Furthermore, the early sixes don't have the failure-prone DEF emissions controls.

EDIT: for some reason, the site keeps substituting a smiley face GIF for the "8" in 2008.
DAWg134 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2019, 09:15 PM   #7
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 3
Default

On our 5’s, we’ve not had any complications - yet! I’ve heard plenty of pros & cons - majority leans toward 5’s.
However, bottom line is to 1) be aware of model’s common problems/potential defects; and 2) upkeep it well-maintained at all time. It’s been humming like a charm!
BTW: Yes, I replaced common potentially problematic plastic turbo resonator with an aluminum version.
ezdozit is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.