Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 
 


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 08-09-2020, 06:52 PM   #1
Platinum Member
 
markopolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New Brunswick, Canada
Posts: 8,828
Default MPPT vs PWM test

I did quick test to compare the output from a 40A MPPT (Tracer A clone) and 30A PWM solar controller today.

The solar panel specs:
170W
Vmp: 19.01V
Imp: 8.91A

Early afternoon summer sun. Panel pretty much parallel to the ground. 13A load on a 12V lead acid battery.

MPPT controller output 11.7A to 9.7A
PWM controller output 8A

Output current measured using same shunt for both tests.

All equipment including the panel was brought out from air conditioned storage and I suspect that helped get the 11.7A early results. Very hot & very high UV & no cloud cover today. PWM controller was tested second and then I tested the MPPT controller again and got 9.7A.

Looks like I can say that the output was 25% greater using the MPPT controller as it was most often around 10A compared to 8A from the PWM controller.

This is basically common knowledge but still interesting to me to do a direct comparison.

Looking at cost / value / output is interesting. If working within a budgeted amount then adding an additional matching panel would result in more energy being harvested than upgrading to an MPPT controller.

If the van roof is already maxed out with panels then an MPPT controller is a nice upgrade.
markopolo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2020, 07:06 PM   #2
Platinum Member
 
GeorgeRa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,141
Default

Great data, thank you. I don’t have actual numbers but recall that MPPT were much more expensive than PWM charge controllers. This price difference is lower today so it really makes sense to go with MPPT with a new solar installation.
GeorgeRa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2020, 07:31 PM   #3
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Salida
Posts: 157
Default

Thanks - great info.
W9TR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2020, 07:35 PM   #4
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 11,913
Default

Good test for sure. It is always useful to do a confirmation run on all the "rules" that are said to apply and separate the true from urban legends (which we have seen some of when tested and closely looked at).
booster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2020, 08:56 PM   #5
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: America's Seaplane City, FL
Posts: 979
Default

helpful info, thanks.
__________________
Tick tock, baby(Ironbuttal)
2000 Roadtrek Chevy 200 Versatile(sold)
'98 Safari Trek 2480
Just for fun:'15 Kawasaki Versys650LT
Perfection is a fantasy, though improvement is possible(Wifey).
SteveJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.