Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 
 


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 03-09-2019, 10:38 PM   #241
Platinum Member
 
skagitstan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: East of world famous Sedro Woolley, west of Concrete
Posts: 210
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rowiebowie View Post
Good thing you're here to parse (to examine in a minute way : analyze critically) others' responses. My point is that I just never found reading that type of writing style enjoyable. Perhaps fitting for a technical journal where such preciseness is critical.

I stand corrected on my "no guns for you" comment. Glad to hear it, in fact.
.
Yeah, I'm an engineer. I tend to think like that. It overflows into my daily life and decision making process.

Sometimes that pisses off folks less interested in analyzing stuff critically before forming and expressing an opinion.

Since I can't predict what reading style(s) others "enjoy", I'll just continue to write in the style that suits me.

If a poster I'm responding to starts implying that arriving at a different conclusion than that poster, based on using an analytic approach to cited statistics, linked with a different set of life/boondocking experiences, is "simply unconscionable", I'm going to view that as an invitation for further discussion. I see that as changing from a discussion of the topic at hand...security while boondocking...to a discussion about morality.

My opinion about guns and boondocking is "meh". I think that given the generally poor level of owner training, they're likely to cause more harm than good as a boondocking self defense tool.
Given the lack of data on this specific combination, if someone feels otherwise, I won't argue with them.
__________________
Turning a 2015 Ford Transit into a camper. Her name is Annie.
You can watch it all happen here:
https://anniebuild.blogspot.com/
Now, with trip reports!!!!
skagitstan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 05:32 PM   #242
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Mendocino County, CA
Posts: 58
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skagitstan View Post
Yeah, I'm an engineer. I tend to think like that. It overflows into my daily life and decision making process.

Sometimes that pisses off folks less interested in analyzing stuff critically before forming and expressing an opinion.


. I think that given the generally poor level of owner training, they're likely to cause more harm than good ....
.
Hmmm; "given the generally poor level of owner training"? Now there's an inference sure to raise a few CCW and NRA hackles! To augment anyone's critical analysis I suggest John Lott's "More Guns, Less Crime."
Alec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 05:44 PM   #243
Platinum Member
 
skagitstan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: East of world famous Sedro Woolley, west of Concrete
Posts: 210
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alec View Post
Hmmm; "given the generally poor level of owner training"? Now there's an inference sure to raise a few CCW and NRA hackles! To augment anyone's critical analysis I suggest John Lott's "More Guns, Less Crime."
One article, right at the top of a google search, says:
"When looking at the demographics of those who own guns, more men (66 percent) than women (49 percent) received formal training. Those who reported buying a gun for personal protection were less likely to have received training than those who owned a gun for activities like hunting or sporting."
https://epi.washington.edu/news/one-...ide-prevention

So the most optimistic view says that about 40% of gun owners have no training.
Even fewer have any firearm self defense training.


BTW, as for CCW & NRA hackles, Washington is a "shall issue" state. No training of any sort required. Just the background check.

I remember (sorta) my NRA "training" over 50 years ago. It mainly consisted of instructions on how not to look down the barrel to see what was causing a jam, how to hold and aim your rifle, how to clear and clean it, and maybe an hour or two of range practice. Oh, and to tell us kids that it wasn't a toy.
__________________
Turning a 2015 Ford Transit into a camper. Her name is Annie.
You can watch it all happen here:
https://anniebuild.blogspot.com/
Now, with trip reports!!!!
skagitstan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 06:14 PM   #244
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,380
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alec View Post
Hmmm; "given the generally poor level of owner training"? Now there's an inference sure to raise a few CCW and NRA hackles! To augment anyone's critical analysis I suggest John Lott's "More Guns, Less Crime."
That book has not been without controversy in terms of its conclusions...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/More_Guns,_Less_Crime
gregmchugh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 06:29 PM   #245
Bud
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: LA
Posts: 1,529
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregmchugh View Post
That book has not been without controversy in terms of its conclusions...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/More_Guns,_Less_Crime
And if someone wants to learn about gun violence in the US, this is a reasonable start:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_vi..._United_States

Bud
Bud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 06:55 PM   #246
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Central Arizona, HiDesert & Mountains
Posts: 295
Default

This thread is "fasinating" in how it has evolved into a them vs. Us (gun nuts vs. anti-gunners) ie. libs vs. neo-cons.
Keep it up, ya'all!
AZ ADVenturist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 07:07 PM   #247
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Mendocino County, CA
Posts: 58
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skagitstan View Post
One article, right at the top of a google search, says:
"When looking at the demographics of those who own guns, more men (66 percent) than women (49 percent) received formal training. Those who reported buying a gun for personal protection were less likely to have received training than those who owned a gun for activities like hunting or sporting."
https://epi.washington.edu/news/one-...ide-prevention

So the most optimistic view says that about 40% of gun owners have no training.
Even fewer have any firearm self defense training.
Ah ... no "formal" training? So the conclusion is that without "formal " training the majority of gun owners are incompetent in the use of a gun. Suppose we stipulate that statistics gathered from the internet are somewhat acceptable, I would posit that 40% is too high, and that it, "formal" training is relatively unimportant.

Since the actual operation of most guns can be mastered in fifteen minutes, the real concern is knowing how to use it safely. The usual admonitions are: treat all guns as if they are always loaded; never point the gun at anything you don't want to kill. Two or three other considerations might be to know that bullets go through walls, or through foliage or over hills. Common sense, yes? I'm open to an argument that "formal training" is necessary because ......
Alec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 07:11 PM   #248
Bud
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: LA
Posts: 1,529
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AZ ADVenturist View Post
This thread is "fasinating" in how it has evolved into a them vs. Us (gun nuts vs. anti-gunners) ie. libs vs. neo-cons.
Keep it up, ya'all!
I don't see it that way at all. You including me and if so, which side am I on if any?

Bud
Bud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 07:15 PM   #249
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Mendocino County, CA
Posts: 58
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregmchugh View Post
That book has not been without controversy in terms of its conclusions...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/More_Guns,_Less_Crime
A book about guns is controversial? Oh say it isn't so.

I guess we have wandered from the topic a bit. Sorry.
Alec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 07:52 PM   #250
Platinum Member
 
skagitstan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: East of world famous Sedro Woolley, west of Concrete
Posts: 210
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alec View Post
Ah ... no "formal" training? So the conclusion is that without "formal " training the majority of gun owners are incompetent in the use of a gun. Suppose we stipulate that statistics gathered from the internet are somewhat acceptable, I would posit that 40% is too high, and that it, "formal" training is relatively unimportant.

Since the actual operation of most guns can be mastered in fifteen minutes, the real concern is knowing how to use it safely. The usual admonitions are: treat all guns as if they are always loaded; never point the gun at anything you don't want to kill. Two or three other considerations might be to know that bullets go through walls, or through foliage or over hills. Common sense, yes? I'm open to an argument that "formal training" is necessary because ......
You misunderstand me.

In a high stress situation in a confined space, it's natural that one will be more prone to error: a misinterpretation of real threat level, a misinterpretation of appropriate response, a possible inclination to over-react, loss of situational awareness, etc. Hell, that even happens to trained cops on a regular basis...misinterpretation of threat level, leading to tragic overreaction.

That, IMO, makes resorting to a firearm for self defense, by someone who hasn't trained, more dangerous than if the person is trained. And one does not get that sort of training informally.

Again, IMO, that raises the danger to all concerned, innocent, bystander, or not. And the data seems to show that MANY folks have not have that training, but still think carrying as a self defense insurance is a good idea. Partly perhaps, because firearms ARE so easy to use that even a caveman can do it.

To be clear, I am not "anti-gun". I take guns when boondocking. I even have my CCL in my wallet. But not for self defense against a thief.

If you are convinced you have that sort of training/skill set, mental attitude, and think the risk of boondocking is high, then great...carry for self defense.

But since this thread is about security while boondocking, I think it is also important to point out the possible downsides of that decision. My OPINION is that a gun is as likely to make a boondocking confrontation more dangerous. Not more secure.
__________________
Turning a 2015 Ford Transit into a camper. Her name is Annie.
You can watch it all happen here:
https://anniebuild.blogspot.com/
Now, with trip reports!!!!
skagitstan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 08:47 PM   #251
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Central Arizona, HiDesert & Mountains
Posts: 295
Default

@Bud; nothing personal intended!
AZ ADVenturist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 08:50 PM   #252
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 926
Default

If I think boondocking in THIS spot is so dangerous that I think I need a gun, maybe I shouldn’t be here.
__________________
2014 Promaster 136" Self-Build

Build Site: msnomersvan.wordpress.com
Travel Site: woodworkingtraveler.wordpress.com
MsNomer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 08:52 PM   #253
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Washington
Posts: 98
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alec View Post
Ah ... no "formal" training?
Since the actual operation of most guns can be mastered in fifteen minutes, the real concern is knowing how to use it safely. The usual admonitions are: treat all guns as if they are always loaded; never point the gun at anything you don't want to kill. Two or three other considerations might be to know that bullets go through walls, or through foliage or over hills. Common sense, yes? I'm open to an argument that "formal training" is necessary because ......
So, based on your argument, why do we spend so much time and $ "training" police, military and security personnel in the use of firearms? Could it be that there are some benefits to actually training in something? Or, do you find that when you want to do a new activity, the actions involved come automatically to you?

I have been enjoying this thread for a while without contributing. I am extremely neutral about guns, don't love them and don't hate them - they just are, like any tool. But I can honestly say that in my lifetime, I do not believe I have ever been in a situation that a gun would have made better/safer...and many where a gun would have probably made things worse - for exactly skagitstan's stated reasoning, I am not trained and might do exactly the wrong thing at exactly the wrong time.

BTW I, like some others have said, have no fear boondocking in the woods. But just last month our van broke down in Newport Oregon and we camped in a car dealer's lot while waiting for parts - now that was scary with dumpster divers at 2am, street kids partying all nite - no sleep for us.

Dave
D&J Phillips is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 09:21 PM   #254
Platinum Member
 
skagitstan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: East of world famous Sedro Woolley, west of Concrete
Posts: 210
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MsNomer View Post
If I think boondocking in THIS spot is so dangerous that I think I need a gun, maybe I shouldn’t be here.
Got to agree with this.
Why and how would anyone want to engage in some enjoyable activity where they fear someone else might want to hurt them?
__________________
Turning a 2015 Ford Transit into a camper. Her name is Annie.
You can watch it all happen here:
https://anniebuild.blogspot.com/
Now, with trip reports!!!!
skagitstan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 09:29 PM   #255
Platinum Member
 
rowiebowie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,632
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skagitstan View Post
To be clear, I am not "anti-gun". I take guns when boondocking. I even have my CCL in my wallet. But not for self defense against a thief.

If you are convinced you have that sort of training/skill set, mental attitude, and think the risk of boondocking is high, then great...carry for self defense.

But since this thread is about security while boondocking, I think it is also important to point out the possible downsides of that decision. My OPINION is that a gun is as likely to make a boondocking confrontation more dangerous. Not more secure.
I followed you until here.
Then you went there.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MsNomer View Post
If I think boondocking in THIS spot is so dangerous that I think I need a gun, maybe I shouldn’t be here.
I agree, but you can never be sure that initial situations won't change.
rowiebowie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 09:54 PM   #256
Platinum Member
 
skagitstan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: East of world famous Sedro Woolley, west of Concrete
Posts: 210
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rowiebowie View Post
I followed you until here.
Then you went there.
OK, so we disagree.

You apparently feel safer camping with self defense guns. I don't.

So you carry for whatever personal reason you want, and perhaps recommend that people you don't know also carry for your reason. (Although I don't think I've seen you write what your reason is).

I'll carry for my own personal reasons, which exclude self defense while boondocking, explain why that is my opinion, and tell others that it's up to them to weigh the pros and cons for themselves.
Do you have problems with that? Maybe it's just the way I read it, but it sorta sounds like you do.


Quote:
Originally Posted by rowiebowie View Post
I agree, but you can never be sure that initial situations won't change.
That is true. Everything in life has risks. Mostly always manageable in a peaceful way. Even in cities.

It's easy enough, for me at least, to manage them in a boondocking scenario, without lethal force as a backup.
Just like mitigating risk does not mean I need to carry a chainsaw on a hike in case an evil tree assaults me.

If someone is fearful enough of boondocking, yet still wants to participate, I'm not gonna suggest they stop carrying.

But please, not around me. I don't really want frightened people waving guns around near my peaceful campsite. IMO, fear and guns don't mix.
Actually, I don't think fear and camping go together all that well either.
__________________
Turning a 2015 Ford Transit into a camper. Her name is Annie.
You can watch it all happen here:
https://anniebuild.blogspot.com/
Now, with trip reports!!!!
skagitstan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 10:56 PM   #257
Platinum Member
 
GeorgeRa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,141
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MsNomer View Post
If I think boondocking in THIS spot is so dangerous that I think I need a gun, maybe I shouldn’t be here.
Great summary.
GeorgeRa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 10:59 PM   #258
Platinum Member
 
engnrsrule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: VA
Posts: 320
Default

I haven't boondocked in remote areas, but do the Walmart thing regularly. Our itinerary once had us overnighting in Newark, which did not feel great. I looked for well lit (Most walmart lots have pretty good lighting) and line of sight to security camera. Then I noticed 2 18 wheelers with a comfortable space between them so I jumped in the "rocking chair" and stayed there for the night. Safety in numbers.
engnrsrule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2019, 11:35 PM   #259
Platinum Member
 
skagitstan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: East of world famous Sedro Woolley, west of Concrete
Posts: 210
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by engnrsrule View Post
I haven't boondocked in remote areas, but do the Walmart thing regularly. Our itinerary once had us overnighting in Newark, which did not feel great. I looked for well lit (Most walmart lots have pretty good lighting) and line of sight to security camera. Then I noticed 2 18 wheelers with a comfortable space between them so I jumped in the "rocking chair" and stayed there for the night. Safety in numbers.
Man, regularly camping in the city like that would freak me out!
Would freak the dog out too!
__________________
Turning a 2015 Ford Transit into a camper. Her name is Annie.
You can watch it all happen here:
https://anniebuild.blogspot.com/
Now, with trip reports!!!!
skagitstan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2019, 12:23 AM   #260
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Mendocino County, CA
Posts: 58
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MsNomer View Post
If I think boondocking in THIS spot is so dangerous that I think I need a gun, maybe I shouldn’t be here.
Exactly right! The gun is for those other spots.
Alec is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
blm, boondocking, security

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.