Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
 
 


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 07-28-2016, 12:38 PM   #1
Platinum Member
 
markopolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New Brunswick, Canada
Posts: 8,828
Default Mercedes-Benz Breaks Ground on Plant in S.C.

On RV Business: Mercedes-Benz Breaks Ground on Plant in S.C.
Link: Mercedes-Benz Breaks Ground on Plant in S.C. | RV Business

Quote:
Mercedes-Benz broke ground Wednesday (July 27) on a $500 million addition to its commercial van factory in South Carolina in a bid to beat competitors by building the next-generation Sprinter stateside and sidestep a steep tariff.
markopolo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2016, 12:56 PM   #2
BBQ
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: East
Posts: 2,483
Default

.

The current hot RV platform is no longer the Sprinter.

The Dodge Ram ProMaster has made so much inroad, you will soon see more of them on the road than the Sprinter.


Maybe the new mid-size Mercedes van will win back some numbers?
BBQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2016, 01:32 PM   #3
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,380
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BBQ View Post
.

The current hot RV platform is no longer the Sprinter.

The Dodge Ram ProMaster has made so much inroad, you will soon see more of them on the road than the Sprinter.


Maybe the new mid-size Mercedes van will win back some numbers?
Isn't the Sprinter still outselling the Promaster by a significant amount?
What was the diesel sales percentage? Over 60% or something like that and Roadtrek is still selling Chevys so all the gas ones are not Promasters...

Aren't there so many Sprinters on the road that even if the Promaster took the lead it would take years to have more on the road?
gregmchugh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2016, 01:57 PM   #4
Platinum Member
 
markopolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New Brunswick, Canada
Posts: 8,828
Default

http://www.classbforum.com/forums/f9...ctor-5634.html

Quote:
In the Class B sector, 64.7% of total units were built on diesel chassis while 35.3% were built on a gas platform.
I'm still surprised by that stat. Gas powered Lexors, Travatos and Zions & Chevy's would all be mixed in the 35.3%.

If the Sprinter starts to sell for less because of the new plant then the diesel percent could very well increase.
markopolo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2016, 04:36 PM   #5
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 417
Default

The plant groundbreaking press event did feature a Class B Sprinter as their highlighted Master Upfitter - a rugged Sportsmobile Sprinter 4x4 with pop top and snorkel.

MB also stated they expect RV sales in both van and cutaway (Class C) formats to be a growth driver for US Sprinter production. I suppose time will tell how MB fares against Ford Transit and FCA Ram Promaster in the market.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg sprinter_groundbreaking_smb.jpg (157.9 KB, 7 views)
rockymtnb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2016, 05:03 PM   #6
BBQ
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: East
Posts: 2,483
Default

.

Mercedes-Benz North Charleston New Van Factory Ground Breaking Ceremony

https://www.facebook.com/plugins/vid...64390974569%2F
BBQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2016, 05:08 PM   #7
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,380
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockymtnb View Post
The plant groundbreaking press event did feature a Class B Sprinter as their highlighted Master Upfitter - a rugged Sportsmobile Sprinter 4x4 with pop top and snorkel.

MB also stated they expect RV sales in both van and cutaway (Class C) formats to be a growth driver for US Sprinter production. I suppose time will tell how MB fares against Ford Transit and FCA Ram Promaster in the market.
Got to use one with a snorkel for a press event...
gregmchugh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2016, 08:14 PM   #8
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Kansas City, Ks. Suburb
Posts: 896
Send a message via Yahoo to bobojay
Default

As far as Winnebago goes, with the class C Transit Fuse recently coming out at a $10k+ lower price than the View/Navion, they've had to increase Fuse production twice now, at the cost of Sprinter View/Navion numbers.
And the settled in after 18 mos. production of the Promaster Travato and Sprinter ERA, has gone to a 4 to 1 ratio of Travatos over ERAs....
I know the Travato is flying out the door as fast as they can make them, partially explaining the Winnebago increase in B market percentages.

For one, Ford is not going to let anybody undercut them in the fleet markets, so I don't see MB picking much further up if any with the Sprinter in the foreseeable future. MB is hiding the Sprinter sales numbers lately by combining Metris numbers in with it
__________________
Bob & Sharon
2019 Winnebago Travato K (2018 Chassis)

Past RV's: 2013 WGO ERA 70A, Chevy PW Lexor
Itasca Navion, 29' Jayco 5th Wheel
bobojay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2016, 09:48 PM   #9
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 417
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregmchugh View Post
Got to use one with a snorkel for a press event...
LOL But it needs a Roo bar too. Been seeing a lot of roos romping 'round the Rockies recently...
rockymtnb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2016, 09:55 PM   #10
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 11,917
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobojay View Post
For one, Ford is not going to let anybody undercut them in the fleet markets, so I don't see MB picking much further up if any with the Sprinter in the foreseeable future. MB is hiding the Sprinter sales numbers lately by combining Metris numbers in with it
Got to agree with this, as Ford wants the lead in that market almost as bad as theydo in the pickup market. Add to that a lot of the van buyers like plumbers and electricians really, really, dislike dealing with high service and parts for MB vans. Even small fleets can't get away from the array of proprietary software and testers that MB requires to test anything. You can bet there will be plenty of aftermarket diagnostics stuff available for the Fords, especially with a US drivetrain.
booster is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2016, 06:20 PM   #11
Platinum Member
 
Boxster1971's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,183
Default

I also agree that the Ford Transit will remain the sales leader.


- - Mike
2013 Airstream Interstate from 2012 Sprinter 3500 tall & long
__________________
2024 Airstream Interstate 19
Boxster1971 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2016, 12:29 AM   #12
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: CA
Posts: 1,668
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxster1971 View Post
I also agree that the Ford Transit will remain the sales leader.


- - Mike
2013 Airstream Interstate from 2012 Sprinter 3500 tall & long
With respect to commercial vans, the Transit is a big seller but in the RV industry I think the Promaster platform will outsell it. Both Zion and Travato sales seem to indicate that. As far as I know, the only Transit platform available in Class B is the LTV Wonder.
cruising7388 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2016, 01:03 AM   #13
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: CA
Posts: 1,668
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by booster View Post
Got to agree with this, as Ford wants the lead in that market almost as bad as theydo in the pickup market. Add to that a lot of the van buyers like plumbers and electricians really, really, dislike dealing with high service and parts for MB vans. Even small fleets can't get away from the array of proprietary software and testers that MB requires to test anything. You can bet there will be plenty of aftermarket diagnostics stuff available for the Fords, especially with a US drivetrain.
My neighbor runs a business with a fleet of about 8 Sprinters. He is unloading them and replacing them with Transits. He says that his Sprinters are chronically in the shop for problems that are centered on the electronics and that basic maintenance costs are much higher than in the one Transit he has bought so far. Also, with MB he was pretty much a prisoner of one repair facility. With the Transit he says he can pick and choose.
cruising7388 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2016, 02:55 AM   #14
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,380
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cruising7388 View Post
With respect to commercial vans, the Transit is a big seller but in the RV industry I think the Promaster platform will outsell it. Both Zion and Travato sales seem to indicate that. As far as I know, the only Transit platform available in Class B is the LTV Wonder.
LTV no longer makes a Class B campers, only Class C campers and the Wonder is a Class C...

There was a rumor of a Winnago Class B on a Transit coming later this year...
gregmchugh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2016, 06:58 AM   #15
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: CA
Posts: 1,668
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregmchugh View Post
LTV no longer makes a Class B campers, only Class C campers and the Wonder is a Class C...

There was a rumor of a Winnago Class B on a Transit coming later this year...
Don't you think that the historical distinctions between A, B or C coaches have become pretty muddied lately? I see Class B's that have current amenities and features that historically have been seen only in Class A coaches. And Class C's that historically were invariably defined with the bunk over cab profile no longer uniformly fit this profile. Using your criteria, the R/T 210 Popular with a slightly wider after end has to be considered a Class C coach while the 190 Popular would be considered Class B even though they sit on the same platform with similar interiors. From where I sit, if there is a distinction here, it's a distinction without any practical difference that creates mostly confusion and certainly no clarity.

What niche woud a WGO Transit Class B fill that isn't addressed by the ERA and the Travato?
cruising7388 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2016, 11:57 AM   #16
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 11,917
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cruising7388 View Post
Don't you think that the historical distinctions between A, B or C coaches have become pretty muddied lately? I see Class B's that have current amenities and features that historically have been seen only in Class A coaches. And Class C's that historically were invariably defined with the bunk over cab profile no longer uniformly fit this profile. Using your criteria, the R/T 210 Popular with a slightly wider after end has to be considered a Class C coach while the 190 Popular would be considered Class B even though they sit on the same platform with similar interiors. From where I sit, if there is a distinction here, it's a distinction without any practical difference that creates mostly confusion and certainly no clarity.

What niche woud a WGO Transit Class B fill that isn't addressed by the ERA and the Travato?
I don't the distinctions between the definitions of the classes has become muddled, it is just that the marketing people are choosing to call things what they aren't. The definitions have always been that if it started as a full bodied van, it is a B. If it started as a cutaway it is a C. If it is on a designated motorhome chassis it is an A. Features and options have never been considered in the class rating, as far as I know. A 210 starts life as a full steel body van so is a B. A 200 Roadtrek is technically a C as it started life as a cutaway.

With no one to enforce the "rules", you can bet the manufacturers will call their units whatever they want to for their own benefit. Best to just ignore what they are called and get what you like.
booster is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2016, 12:11 PM   #17
Platinum Member
 
markopolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New Brunswick, Canada
Posts: 8,828
Default

These definitions might help - https://www.rv.org/class_C.htm

I like to keep it simple:
A Class A is built on a custom, purpose built chassis.
A Class B is built on a van chassis.
A Class C is built on a cutaway chassis.

I have complicated things a bit and used the B+ (aka C minus) moniker Those units don't have storage capacity seen in some Class C's. The 30' Class C I owned had full pass-through basement storage.

The RT 210 starts its life as a van. The older Chevy based RT 200 started its life as a cutaway chassis (I think, correct me if wrong). The 210 is a Class B and the 200 would have technically been a Class C.

Everyone can call them what they want though This debate has been going on longer than my involvement with RVing and it will likely continue long after I'm gone - my 2 cents won't change a thing!
markopolo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2016, 12:13 PM   #18
BBQ
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: East
Posts: 2,483
Default

.

A cutaway is a Class C.

For those without an overhead bed, the sales people try to call it a B+.

Why do they think B+ sounds better is beyond me.
because we all know the Class C is more popular
and the Class B sales is only ~10% of Class C.


BBQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2016, 02:46 PM   #19
Platinum Member
 
Davydd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 5,964
Default

Ah here we go again. Class Cs with B-ness envy. This comes up time and again.
__________________
Davydd
2021 Advanced RV 144 custom Sprinter
2015 Advanced RV Extended body Sprinter
2011 Great West Van Legend Sprinter
2005 Pleasure-way Plateau TS Sprinter
Davydd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2016, 03:17 PM   #20
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,380
Default

Back to the original point, there is currently no Transit based Class B camper van built on a van chassis produced in North America by the major manufacturers, only available currently from the custom manufacturers...
gregmchugh is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.