Class B Lithium Batteries and Solar for Off-Grid A/C Use

Thread Summary

Summarized on:
Original Member Title: Investigating Class B RVs with lithium batteries
This AI-generated summary may contain inaccuracies. Please refer to the full thread for complete details.
A new RVer comparing Noovo and Coachmen Beyond models asked whether lithium batteries and roof solar could replace a generator for boondocking, especially during cloudy, hot, humid weather with heavy A/C use. Members generally agreed that lithium is a major improvement over AGM, but roof space on a Class B limits solar enough that regular off-grid air conditioning is difficult without shore power, generator use, or significant engine/alternator charging.

Several members said a large lithium...
More...
I’m sorry I wasn’t more clear; That all-time low of 74% was meant, in general (since the charging system upgrades) …and certainly NOT observed during the 6+ day period of ‘AC on-battery testing!’

No wonder the numbers didn’t compute.
 
That makes more sense, but still the base numbers are hard to figure, especially after I read up on the AC unit and such.

To be clear, during the 6 days you had no other charging other than the solar?

The internal temp in the van was stated at 85*. What were the exterior temps during those 6 days.

Solar reflective covers on the windows?

A 24 hour state of charge graph would be useful and is probably in the history of the Victron monitor.
 
Correct, no other charging but the rooftop solar.

Call me a shameless liar if you want …I’m okay with that. I’m not here to debate. Sorry the math won’t convince you. Moving on
 
It is obvious that you have been chastised elsewhere, I think, and I am not here to do that. What I do want to be able to do figure out how you get these results that don't appear to fit other users in quite a few other applications. What I don't want to do is have new users or shoppers get an incorrect impression relating to what to expect from a very expensive investment. I certainly am not here to bust your chops in some ruthless attack or call you shameless.

The printout and exterior temps would help all of us, skeptical or not, see how the system is functioning to get the results you are seeing and also help us in evaluating other systems to predict performance. The prediction is very important on a forum like this where new users and shoppers come to get accurate advise they my not get elsewhere. What you probably heard elsewhere and probably would have been told here if you asked how that system would work ahead of time would probably be similar, I think, as we have never seen this kind of results that I know of. The actual power use of the AC unit in question during dehumidifying seems to be non existent with only a vague reference to the compressor running intermittently at lower speeds and the fan on continuously at a lower speed. That leaves a big variation in power use possible.

If this was typical a AC from batteries application where folks want to run the AC long enough to keep the pets safe, or run the AC overnight in the very hot southern areas, the results are like way different than you are seeing based on your results. We do hear in those situations users that run lower fan speeds to get better moisture removal so that part would be similar as long as enough heat can be removed that way.

What you do is totally up to you.
 
My final post on ClassBForum.com regarding this matter, because:

I made the original source information available to you, referencing the attached post I made on the IRV2.COM site. I have neither a product, nor service to sell anyone. Not looking to build a social media platform that generates ‘clicks’.

The intention of my post is to share relevant information for boondockers (though, I won’t be told HOW to do that) for whom ‘AC on battery runtime’ is a valuable commodity.

Ultimately, whether the information is deemed useful or ignored, matters not to me. I am not here to proselytize or ‘twist anyone’s arm’.

Aspects of your tone/comments seem suggestive of one whom presumes the role of an authoritative ‘gate keeper’. Your inability to ‘make the math work’ is not my concern …and I feel no further obligation to offer insight.

Clearly, you are a skeptical ‘unbeliever’ …which is perfectly fine with me. Enjoy your RV and AC capability as it is. Place me on ‘ignore’ …or I can just delete the information I’ve attempted to share

Very few people could explain how pressing the keys on their keyboard ‘magically’ creates a screen icon …yet (to the consternation of technophobes) it works.

**Extracted from IRV2.COM**


Can off-grid AC runtime be measured in days ...or WEEKS?
(Yes)

The eventual 'mission requirement' I'd visualized for my CH Platinum 220TB, was to obtain robust boondocking capabilities ...primarily in spring/summer climates.

Incremental upgrades from multiple aftermarket sources/installers have allowed that objective to have finally been reached.

An effective independent energy producing/storing strategy can take on different forms/budgets.

Secondary alternator (underhood
generator)

Large solar array(s): Rooftop/portable

Expansive battery bank

I opted for the second & third methods, as the implementation of an aftermarket secondary alternator on Ford E-series gasoline platforms, remain somewhat of an 'esoteric mystery' ...that most RV service centers refuse to touch.

Not so regarding MB Sprinter vans ...and to a lesser degree; Ford Transit vans/cutaways.

Maximizing rooftop solar capture would require me to accept some aesthetic compromise, but the practical advantages gained, made it certainly worthwhile.

I'd taken numerous measurements & photos while standing atop a ladder, examining my rooftop area ...and considering various solar array designs.

After researching various brands/models/sizes, I felt the best approach for my goal was to tolerate some minor overhang, DO NOT avoid panel installation atop the fridge/freezer vent ...and mount a second array of smaller panels where the 200w panels won't fit (adjacent to AC unit)

A beneficial consequence of the minor panel overhang, is the added roof-shading effect created by shadows and the higher air gap existing between the panel arrays and the roof. (Similar to a 'double roof' or 'cool roof' energy efficient homebuilding designs that reduce radiant heat transfer)

The addition of the 6 solar panels and the Starlink Mini, drastically reduced the UNSHADED percentage of rooftop surface area ...allowing the AC unit to work less.

Efficient use of rooftop space, permitted installation of four 200w Renogy ShadowFlux 'anti-shading' N-type panels,
and two of Renogy's smaller 120w versions of the ShadowFlux model ...totalling 1040w.

Favorable initial data following the initial install (6 June, mid-day in Poncha Springs, CO with scattered clouds) yielded 848w from the 800w array, with a combined array total @ 60amps.

Subsequent daily energy tracking shows consistent averages of 900w + ...or 50 + amps over varied mid-afternoon sky conditions. Enough to provide a substantial 15 percent daily charge to the 1920a battery bank, without using a shore power connection, idling the engine or running the generator.

Current Victron MPPT solar controller technology, provides higher efficiency than the 2018 era Go Power PWM solar controller circuitry installed by CH.

Rooftop panel mounting method/hardware: Oversized adjustable bracketry with larger feet provide greater adhesion and distribute contact pressure over a larger area.

The solar panel fixture methods were unintentionally 'torture tested' when I'd soon encounter 45 MPH wind gusts in Casper, WY. (No creaks or leaks!)

3M VHB industrial grade double-faced adhesive tape applied to the substantial bracket feet, followed by screws and thoroughly covered by permabond caulk. (leak prevention strategy)

Adjustable brackets provide users with ease of access to underside of panels, cable connections and rooftop ...for inspection/cleaning while permitting owners to experiment with preferred angle orientation.

Each of the six 320ah Li Time LiFePO4 batteries replacing the six 100ah BB LiFePO4 batteries, contain 3x the energy density in a form factor just 2-3 inches larger, with just a modestly increased weight.

Li Time's 'Mini' series employ a safe industry-recognized positive/negative terminal design ...and are priced $200 less.

Their customer support & product warranty are an improvement, and the company's financial health and rapidly growing market share are confidence inspiring.

For approx $1200 less than what it cost for a 600ah battery bank, I was able to assemble a 1920ah bank, which occupies only slightly more systems space ...and eliminates justifiable safety concerns over the documented BB terminal design defects and subsequent arcing risks.

Yesterday, I snapped screen shots of the Victron BMV-712 showing that the incoming solar energy was offsetting the power usage of my Atmos AC (during it's compressor cycle) by two thirds ...reducing the energy consumption to just 25 amps.

Conversely, during the AC fan circulation cycle, I regained 40 - 50+ amps. The solar gain during this alternating dual-phase operation, had previously allowed my 600a battery bank to run the AC for 2+ continuous days.

Testing of the AC runtime on battery/solar array 22 - 28 July 2026 Fortson, GA. RV parking pad surrounded by tall pine trees, leaving a small unobstructed 'solar window'.
Cloudy skies, 85 degrees, 73 percent humidity.

Start time: 12:13 pm
Battery bank SOC = 100 percent.
Dreiha Atmos AC (Dehumidifier mode)

Temperature setpoint: 86 degrees.
86 degrees doesn't sound 'comfy' at first glance ...until ALL of the humidity is removed. Suddenly, it feels like a breezy 72 degrees!

The final battery bank system check occurred at 2:47 pm on 28 July = 11 percent. The battery bank signed-off the following day in the early morning hours of the 29th.

Observations/conclusions:

Daily on-battery AC energy expenditure averaged between 7 - 13 percent.

The test conditions coincidentally created an approximate worst case scenario, that significantly handicapped solar energy collection.

Trees! Lots of em:

The driveway and RV parking pad are closely encircled by (mostly) tall pine trees, which significantly reduce continuous sun exposure and effective energy harvesting angles.

I would never intentionally park in a heavily forested area with such a narrow 'clear sky window'.

Pine needles:

I didn't have the foresight to employ a ladder for visually inspecting the panels before/during testing ...to ensure their surfaces were clean and remained obstruction free.

However, several days after testing concluded, while on the second story of the house ...I noticed on the panels a substantial accumulation of pine needles.

Naturally, I cannot determine the quantity of needles present while testing commenced, but the shedding pattern of the pine trees observed around the driveway/parking pad perimeter strongly suggest there'd been enough needles present to challenge Renogy's vaunted 'ShadowFlux' feature.

Sloped driveway impact:

Because I hadn't pulled my rig up onto the leveling ramps that normally lie beneath it ...the panels were nowhere close to parallel with the ground/sky. Further aggravating the sub-optimal solar exposure conditions.

Given the restrictive 'solar-impaired' test location combined with two days of sporadic rain showers and moderate - high cloud cover during the trial, I'm convinced that my typical spring/summer boondocking conditions will easily provide a WEEK+ of continuous on-battery AC runtime.
 
I am sorry you feel picked on or insulted as this is not the intent.

The summary you posted in the last post answered nearly all the questions needed. Particularly the ambient conditions being very similar to the setpoint of the interior van temp. The temp and and humidity indicate a 75* dewpoint which is high so just taking that down to the low 60s will greatly improve the feel of the air in the van. On edit, I just looked at the discussion on IRV2 and it also mentions solar reflecting window coverings and reflective outdoor drapes on the sides to minimize solar gain.

Being at the same temp in and out, you are removing solar gain, which is largely blocked, and interior generated heat only plus whatever energy is needed to condense out the moisture, so in lower sun and at night no real heat gain to the interior and only the fan to run and whatever moisture is generated inside the van and leaks in from outside.

With those conditions, I certainly can see that you could do a week without any other charging as it is not what we would normally see for folks asking about running AC on batteries. Most are talking about 100+ degrees and not cooling off much at night, plus high humidity sometimes, so they have much more heat to remove as it is happening 24/7 and they probably want a setpoint lower than 85* in most cases.

My point was, and still is, that all of this needs to be stated and totally explained and understood to make it relevant to this thread as the OP was asking about running the AC off solar only charging with heavy AC use and my interpretation of that would not be the same as your use, so your success probably not be the same for the OP. If the OP has stayed with this discussion, they would now have what they need to avoid a costly mistake if their anticipated use pattern is different from what you have.
 
Last edited:
I will surely hate myself later, for ‘taking the bait’ and being lured back into this frustratingly pedantic dialogue.

Why frustrating? Because many of your comments imply officious, patronizing and excessively concerned demeanor …as if every OP is wandering around, hopelessly lost without your reassuring hand-holding and ‘fatherly wisdom’ to lead them out of the woods …to (your version of) safety.

FFS! Sensible adults recognize that the RV lifestyle is COSTLY …with NO guarantees (other than swift & certain massive devaluation of one’s RV).

Truthfully, my rig is a high performance money-pit, with an insatiable appetite for more CASH.

The Risk/Reward analysis and subsequent decision to pour increasingly larger volumes of cubic dollars into my motorhome, was/remains, entirely mine. Nobody attempted to persuade me that the ‘RV lifestyle’ would resemble anything remotely ‘economical’.

When we choose to significantly modify systems comprising a stock RV, it will always constitute a serious gamble. Those of us who choose to ‘play that particular game’ must KNOWINGLY accept the risk & consequences …before placing our bets and ‘spinning the wheel’.

If you were ASSURED of the favorable outcome in advance …uh, it would no longer be gambling, now would it?

Did I REALLY need to include a friggin’ disclaimer** in my post …to the effect.

“The on-battery AC performance parameters obtained by the author should NOT be interpreted as the anticipated standard for application within EVERY recreational vehicle platform, nor potentially suit EVERY owner’s individual comfort level, in EVERY geographic location and EVERY climate zone.”

Seriously!? That seems to be (in essence) what you are suggesting.

Now, excuse me, but I need to go pour bleach in my eyes.
 
You are entitled to your opinion, no question to that.

Since it was posted in a discussion of heavy AC running off batteries and solar and your example was mostly dehumidfying, all the important information of should have been put in to describe what you have and how you use under the conditions of the example. If all the information that we now have was given up front, there would have been no discussion needed as everyone, including the OP could decide it the example and system matched how they would run AC off of batteries and solar without having to ask so many questions about ambient temps, solar blocking, and such. I think very few here would say your system would not work fine under the now known conditions if all that information was known originally.

I don't think most of the new RV shoppers who come here and ask for assistance would say the help they get would patronizing, but I nobody knows for sure unless they state it. They want help and it is very, very common that they don't realize all the input from them is needed to be able to get give good advice doing what they need to do, so we need to ask for there use details to help assure their success.

And no, I don't consider owning an RV gambling and well thought out upgrades or initial purchases by new users appear to consistently good, especially when there is good research done and good advice and help provided.
 
Ending this tiresome petty debate that I hope to never revisit ...and waste another moment on.

Relevant text messages to a friend while camping in Grand Junction, CO.
(Middle of summer ...it was HOT there!, I rarely ventured outside)

I stayed there on-off during multiple visits for a week, very hot ...forcing me to remain inside the rig.

No solar shades deployed, except for interior windshield & cab window covers.

"AC was on all afternoon and night ...turned off at 5:00 am."

"Batteries dropped from 100 - 87 percent SOC."

"The solar arrays alone brought SOC back to 96 percent."

*A week later at Badlands NP*

"Here's some views from the place I'm drycamping at.
No hookups needed ..."

"Ran AC from 5:30 pm to 3:45 am, fell asleep again while "The Good Wife" streamed with the Starlink mini, from 6:00pm to 1:30am."

"In addition to cooking in Microwave for 7 minutes, a portable fan was charging."

"Batteries ran all the way 'DOWN' to a meager 80 percent!"

* The incoming solar routinely recharged the battery bank by 15 percent ...while 24 hour AC energy expenditure ran under 14 percent.

Aftermarket upgrades represent an uncertain risk/reward benefit ratio.

One should read about products and view buyer feedback ...but that DOES NOT answer how YOU, the consumer will react to the change from an RV's oem specifications.

**Specific examples:

4x4 conversion with 6" suspension lift by U-joint Off-road Colorado.

Post-conversion performance factors: Handling effect, turn radius, wind buffeting, fuel efficiency impact, bump compliance, braking distance ...all UNKNOWN.

Scheel-Manns Vario ergonomic heated seats. Researched, but ordered sight-unseen ...how will they feel? Cushioning, support, adjustment range, heating element temperature ...all UNKNOWN.

Kenwood 10" infotainment head unit: GPS display, radio tuner, phone interface, with amplifier: Researched, but unable to manipulate or test function of a demo unit ...all UNKNOWN.

The same observation holds true for the following component upgrades:

Victron Multiplus II inverter-charger.
Victron 12-50XS DC DC charger.
Victron Solar controllers.
Renogy Shadowflux solar panels.
Eco Flow portable 220w solar panels.
Battle Born (6) 200ah LiFePO4 batteries.
MaxxAir deluxe remote control vent fans.
Starlink Mini.
ARB onboard air compressor.
Toyo Open Country AT tires.
Warn 12K winch.
Custom designed front & rear bumpers.
Owl Vans expedition cargo boxes.
RadFlow 2.5 adjustable rebound remote res shocks.

Are you finally BEGINNING to see the light? None of this small sampling of past/current RV upgrades on my rig, were KNOWN quantities to me, prior to their purchase & installation.

How they would perform and whether any compromises were required by me to accept, would only be revealed with time under real-world usage conditions.

Therefore, what else do these substantial RV modifications from stock configuration represent ...except, a calculated RISK!?

If somehow you still remain unable to comprehend the existence of aftermarket upgrade uncertainty, one cannot be blamed for questioning the validity & efficacy of your 'advice' to others.
 

Attachments

  • 20250602_142514.jpg
    20250602_142514.jpg
    107.5 KB · Views: 16
  • 20240331_103648.jpg
    20240331_103648.jpg
    138.6 KB · Views: 17
  • 20240330_075211.jpg
    20240330_075211.jpg
    159.4 KB · Views: 16
  • 20240706_141619.jpg
    20240706_141619.jpg
    225.8 KB · Views: 16
  • 20240706_141740.jpg
    20240706_141740.jpg
    149 KB · Views: 18
  • 20240707_072238.jpg
    20240707_072238.jpg
    237.5 KB · Views: 15
  • 20250724_180134.jpg
    20250724_180134.jpg
    63.5 KB · Views: 18
  • 20250731_110000.jpg
    20250731_110000.jpg
    133.7 KB · Views: 15
  • 20250731_142633.jpg
    20250731_142633.jpg
    131.6 KB · Views: 14
As I'd made in the case above ...the clear uncertainty involved in all of the expensive aftermarket modifications that I'd HOPED would provide a satisfying quantifiable improvement...

There were absolutely NO guarantee of a favorable outcome, which is just another way of saying; the upgrades in reality, constitute a GAMBLE.

My rig is no highly waxed 'garage queen' ...it has been repeatedly 'torture-tested' on 4x4 Jeep trails in Moab, UT and most recently while running the first half of the 'Rim Rocker Trail' spanning Montrose to Moab.

Annually, I put 3 times more miles on this rig ...versus my Chevy Colorado 4x4 truck. I've logged more than 44K miles since the UJOR 4x4 conversion & 6" lift.

Therefore, what I am attempting to emphasize, is that these modifications have gone through rigorous field testing over the long term, while I have collected countless hours of anecdotal user experience using 'AC on battery' operation, as well as other component functionality data.

In conclusion: I have nothing to gain in sharing the information, nor do I offer any foolish promises to RV owners whom are considering similar upgrades. In the end, we are each 'on our own' when looking to substantially modify an RV from stock configuration.
 

Attachments

  • 20260618_142509.jpg
    20260618_142509.jpg
    207.3 KB · Views: 10
  • 20260619_100824.jpg
    20260619_100824.jpg
    150.3 KB · Views: 10
  • 20260620_113147.jpg
    20260620_113147.jpg
    112.8 KB · Views: 9
  • 20260620_135633.jpg
    20260620_135633.jpg
    223.6 KB · Views: 10
  • 20260620_133422.jpg
    20260620_133422.jpg
    222.3 KB · Views: 11
  • 20260620_120534.jpg
    20260620_120534.jpg
    217.5 KB · Views: 9
  • 20260620_120944.jpg
    20260620_120944.jpg
    241.5 KB · Views: 9
  • 20260813_144932.jpg
    20260813_144932.jpg
    187.5 KB · Views: 10
  • 20260819_144055.jpg
    20260819_144055.jpg
    164.3 KB · Views: 11
  • 20260819_143955.jpg
    20260819_143955.jpg
    160.1 KB · Views: 9

Try RV LIFE Pro Free for 7 Days

  • New Ad-Free experience on this RV LIFE Community.
  • Plan the best RV Safe travel with RV LIFE Trip Wizard.
  • Navigate with our RV Safe GPS mobile app.
  • and much more...
Try RV LIFE Pro Today
Back
Top