Roadtrek 210 4L80E transmission overheating on mountain climbs

Thread Summary

Summarized on:
Original Member Title: Express/Savana temperature/overheat and 4L80E transmission
This AI-generated summary may contain inaccuracies. Please refer to the full thread for complete details.
An RVer with a 2005 Chevrolet Express 3500 based Roadtrek 210 reported coolant and 4L80E transmission temperatures climbing above 240 to 250°F on desert and mountain grades, with transmission temperature usually leading coolant temperature and the dash warning chiming on the Mt. Whitney Portal climb. Running the heater reduced coolant temperature first and transmission temperature later, leading the member to suspect torque-converter heat and the factory transmission cooler loop in the...
More...
Hi am from Minnesota and just got back from Colorado going up and down many steep mountains. I was all the way to Durango and back. I have a 2008 Chevy 210 P and I didn’t do anything on the front end my van is stock with the original radiator no trans cooler other than what’s in the radiator. I didn’t modify any Transmission shift points. Everything is completely stock. There’s already too much heat in my opinion flowing through the radiator and the air conditioner so I didn’t want to introduce any more heat on the front end so I left the transmission go into the radiator but on the return line before it gets back to the Transmission I cut the line and spliced in a aftermarket cooler. The cooler has its own fan and its own in-line thermostat so when it gets hot enough it’ll kick on and when it cools off enough, it will shut itself off. I also installed the B&M transmission temp gauge on the van in line to monitor what was going on and on my longest steepest climb in Colorado pulling a Goldwing with our van loaded down quite heavy to begin with my trans temp never got above 210 most of the time it was at 160° cruising down the road. I installed this aftermarket cooler underneath the van pretty much under the driver seat where there is kind of a open area now I have absolutely zero worries going up and down steep mountains
What gear and speed were you climbing with?
 
Hi am from Minnesota and just got back from Colorado going up and down many steep mountains. I was all the way to Durango and back. I have a 2008 Chevy 210 P and I didn’t do anything on the front end my van is stock with the original radiator no trans cooler other than what’s in the radiator. I didn’t modify any Transmission shift points. Everything is completely stock. There’s already too much heat in my opinion flowing through the radiator and the air conditioner so I didn’t want to introduce any more heat on the front end so I left the transmission go into the radiator but on the return line before it gets back to the Transmission I cut the line and spliced in a aftermarket cooler. The cooler has its own fan and its own in-line thermostat so when it gets hot enough it’ll kick on and when it cools off enough, it will shut itself off. I also installed the B&M transmission temp gauge on the van in line to monitor what was going on and on my longest steepest climb in Colorado pulling a Goldwing with our van loaded down quite heavy to begin with my trans temp never got above 210 most of the time it was at 160° cruising down the road. I installed this aftermarket cooler underneath the van pretty much under the driver seat where there is kind of a open area now I have absolutely zero worries going up and down steep mountains
I have the same transmission cooling setup as you in my 2006 RT 210P. My transmission temps have never gone high but I'm not towing as heavy as you. My problem is engine temperature. On a climb like you did I have to turn the heater on to keep the temps under control. I do regular coolant changes, have changed the fan clutch twice to a heavy duty unit and replaced water pump a couple years ago. Nothing changed with any of these. What were your engine temperatures on these climbs?
 
It is possible the poster from Minnesota that saw 210 tops while towing is looking at a different temp than most of the other folks on here who are using a Scangauge that measures the temp internally, I think someplace in the valve body. A Scangauge reacts very quickly to load when it goes on when climbing and pan temps react quite slowly. The out to the cooler line is usually someplace in between. As mentioned it would also be good to know the speed and gear it was in so we can see if it had the converter locked/unlocked or a point where it might be going in and out. An very large unbody cooler with it's own fan can have a lot of capacity for certain, but it is also likely in an area of hotter air also so that is downside.
 
On the steep climbs 2nd gear going up with engine rpm’s about 3300 and coming down at least 3300 holding the van back to minimize braking and I am measuring the trans temp after the radiator cooler and before it goes into the auxiliary cooler because i didn’t want to splice into the supply line since I was going to cut the return line for the auxiliary cooler anyway so my temps would be a little higher if measured on the supply line and as far as it being warmer under the van it obviously is warmer then the ambient temperature outside but with the van moving it shouldn’t be that bad. Like I said before before I ordered anything I took the grill off and looked things over and I decided that I didn’t want to put transmission coolers out in front of the radiator because the area is really congested and restricted and struggles for airflow in its stock form and by putting the coolers out in front. It would only make the engine run hotter and the air conditioner be less efficient with less cool air and less air flow That’s why I decided to put mine underneath and oversized the cooler because of the warmer air that would be flowing to it
 
On the steep climbs 2nd gear going up with engine rpm’s about 3300 and coming down at least 3300 holding the van back to minimize braking and I am measuring the trans temp after the radiator cooler and before it goes into the auxiliary cooler because i didn’t want to splice into the supply line since I was going to cut the return line for the auxiliary cooler anyway so my temps would be a little higher if measured on the supply line and as far as it being warmer under the van it obviously is warmer then the ambient temperature outside but with the van moving it shouldn’t be that bad. Like I said before before I ordered anything I took the grill off and looked things over and I decided that I didn’t want to put transmission coolers out in front of the radiator because the area is really congested and restricted and struggles for airflow in its stock form and by putting the coolers out in front. It would only make the engine run hotter and the air conditioner be less efficient with less cool air and less air flow That’s why I decided to put mine underneath and oversized the cooler because of the warmer air that would be flowing to it
Thanks, the explains a lot of it, I think. I need to check the older post for the details to make certain, but it appears that you were into a range where the torque converter was locked at least a lot of the time. The shift and lockup settings are in mph so do happen to recall what the speed was climbing. I think that rpm will give enough to lockup in the mid 50s mph at full throttle. Where we wind up with an issue is on roads that where you can't go that fast like winding two lane climbs with under 50mph speed limits as there is no way to go fast enough to lock up even in second gear. Your speed would also help explain the not extreme engine heat.

You might want to put on a Scangauge or other OBD monitor to see the actual transmission temp that the PCM and fluid are seeing inside the transmission, also, as that will be more real time temperature and what the PCM will use to decide whether to go into hot limp mode or not.

My guess is that is if you wind up on a slower, steep, road you will get to max temps just like the rest of so being aware of that would be good to know. With no lockup allowed in low gear you limit out on low speed for keeping the transmission and engine cool in second gear.

On edit: I just looked at the lockup chart that is in the PCM and my rpm vs speed spreadsheet from the older discussion and at 3300 rpm you will just about at the 50 mph that is needed for lockup in second gear and high throttle position so what I have above is likely what went on with your climb. 5mph slower and it probably would have been much different from a heat standpoint.

The lockup chart and rpm/vs speed spreadsheet are in this discussion: you would need to convert your stock tire size if you have them so you tire revs would be 683 rev/mile instead of 657 rev/mile and speed a bit slower but speedo an computer won't know that unless you have done speedo correction and we hadn't at that time.

Overheat discussion link
 
Last edited:
When we explain steep mountains and hills, it isn't the same as naming the mountains and how steep they are. A lot of people see a 3000 ft mountain as high. Going to Denver from the east is very steep and would like people to compare apples to apples. That is a 7% grade going up to 11,000 ft. Just a little rant.
 
When we explain steep mountains and hills, it isn't the same as naming the mountains and how steep they are. A lot of people see a 3000 ft mountain as high. Going to Denver from the east is very steep and would like people to compare apples to apples. That is a 7% grade going up to 11,000 ft. Just a little rant.
I totally agree with you on that for sure, as it is all relative. Going out of near north of Denver up to the visitor center from the east to 11 or 12K feet is slow at 35mph, steep, and curvy and is where we had our most problems with heat and went back to there to test changes. Going up the Eisenhower was absolute cake, even stock so very different.

The same thing applies to a lot of things on the forum as posters are giving information in different ways or taking readings differently, as it this post where the temp given is from a different location of the system so can't be compared directly to what the rest of us see for temps.

As with most things, the quality of the answers is often related directly to the quality and completeness of the questions asked, so very important that we get all the details even if they seem trivial.
 
TWX, just wondering if your van had a full floater 4.10 axle in it, is the GVCW rating still 9600lbs or greater?
TWX will probably come in also, but on a Roadtrek built on the Express van 3500 will all have the rear rated at the rear tire max rated capacity, not the axle. A full floater with more inherent capacity will still carry a 6084 rear axle max weight which is the capacity of the E rated 245/75/16 tires and 9600 gross vehicle weight. Once the van is built and stickered, you can put on bigger tires and a stronger rear axle, but it will NOT change the rated load capacity if you happened to get inspected or got in an accident where and insurance company weighed it as overweight.
 
Last edited:

Try RV LIFE Pro Free for 7 Days

  • New Ad-Free experience on this RV LIFE Community.
  • Plan the best RV Safe travel with RV LIFE Trip Wizard.
  • Navigate with our RV Safe GPS mobile app.
  • and much more...
Try RV LIFE Pro Today
Back
Top