|
|
02-17-2016, 05:53 AM
|
#2
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 367
|
Interesting. I always wanted a new Chinook, but never could afford one. With that price it looks like I still can't .
|
|
|
02-17-2016, 06:24 AM
|
#3
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: PHX, AZ
Posts: 2,658
|
it's a name, somebody bought the rights to use it.
The hallmark of the Chinook was the 1 piece fiberglass "hull-like" structure.
this appears to have same relationship to the original chinook as I do. None
But it's good to have another option on the market.
Mike
|
|
|
02-17-2016, 03:25 PM
|
#4
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: San Diego
Posts: 320
|
That's just what we need - another Sprinter-based RV.
|
|
|
02-18-2016, 05:11 AM
|
#5
|
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: texas
Posts: 8
|
Rather, another Sprinter based RV that I can't afford.
|
|
|
02-19-2016, 12:05 AM
|
#6
|
Gold Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 87
|
Wow, this baby looks expensive!
__________________
2016 (Mercedes) PW Ascent > 2018 (RAM) WGO Travato ‘K’
|
|
|
02-19-2016, 11:17 AM
|
#7
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Greer, South Carolina
Posts: 2,611
|
Hey, at least it's a B this time.
|
|
|
02-19-2016, 07:29 PM
|
#8
|
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by waltbald
Rather, another Sprinter based RV that I can't afford.
|
I'm with you. These prices are just now stupid.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
|
02-19-2016, 07:59 PM
|
#9
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,380
|
The price and styling is clearly in line with their target customer, someone who wants what at least appears to be a luxury vehicle and that sends the message I got the money it takes to have one of these glitzy toys...
Not my cup of tea even at a much lower price...
Not quite as glitzy as a Trump residence or a Newell motor coach but almost getting there...
|
|
|
09-01-2016, 06:03 PM
|
#11
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,380
|
Comparing the new Chinook to the original seems like apples vs oranges to me. My impression of the original Chinook is functional design with high quality construction but no luxury fluff you see on the new version. Closest thing I see to the original these days would be something on the order of the Hymer Ml-T also available in 4WD...
https://www.hymer.com/en/models/moto...ighlights.html
|
|
|
09-01-2016, 06:47 PM
|
#12
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Greer, South Carolina
Posts: 2,611
|
My dealer carries these units. Definately not my cup of tea. You can easily tell Midwest's background in making limos.
Price-wise they aren't terrible - MSRP is on par with Era. Transaction prices may be another matter. So far the units he has are languishing on the lot.
|
|
|
09-03-2016, 01:25 PM
|
#13
|
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Seminole Florida
Posts: 15
|
those "older" Chinooks i.e. before the Sprinter copout. have dual rear tires ,,, is it that much heavier. I am reading they only get 10 mpg...ouch .... just love those "ole" Chinook lines... Ford V10 is a guzzler in whatever you put it in? It must be a weight issue....but it is not much more roomier than a Pleasureway van.
|
|
|
09-03-2016, 01:33 PM
|
#14
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: East
Posts: 2,483
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nautracer
those "older" Chinooks i.e. before the Sprinter copout. have dual rear tires ,,, is it that much heavier. I am reading they only get 10 mpg...ouch .... just love those "ole" Chinook lines... Ford V10 is a guzzler in whatever you put it in? It must be a weight issue....but it is not much more roomier than a Pleasureway van.
|
Most of the old Chevy/Ford big block Class C and Class B+ RV get 8 to 10 MPG. That is just life; they don't get much better even with an empty chassis.
|
|
|
09-03-2016, 01:42 PM
|
#15
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: LA
Posts: 1,547
|
Weight makes a difference overcoming gravity and inertia. Otherwise, weight makes little difference cruising on flat ground.
Bud
|
|
|
09-03-2016, 01:49 PM
|
#16
|
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Seminole Florida
Posts: 15
|
ok, then I am guessing the Chinook could get by without the "duelly" tires ,,,which would reduce some drag. but surely the DOT has some input into this equation
|
|
|
09-03-2016, 03:26 PM
|
#17
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: East
Posts: 2,483
|
Those "older" Chinooks are very well built.
Well built = solid fiberglass, solid wood cabinetry.
|
|
|
09-03-2016, 06:20 PM
|
#18
|
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Seminole Florida
Posts: 15
|
I know. and I want one so bad I can taste it....but 10 mpg............... compare it to a wide camper van without the Duelly tires. I bet the average Coachman wide or Pleasureway gets at least 14-15. is that a reach? the V10 does better on gas milage than some modern v8s.
|
|
|
09-03-2016, 08:42 PM
|
#19
|
Platinum Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: East
Posts: 2,483
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nautracer
I know. and I want one so bad I can taste it....but 10 mpg............... compare it to a wide camper van without the Duelly tires. I bet the average Coachman wide or Pleasureway gets at least 14-15. is that a reach? the V10 does better on gas milage than some modern v8s.
|
Well... you can buy a new rig that gives you 17 MPG,
or buy an old rig that gives you 10 MPG.
If you drive across the continent, say, 3,000 miles.
The new rig will consume 176 gal. At @$2.50/gal, that's $441.
The old rig will consume 300 gal. At @$2.50/gal, that's $750.
A difference of $300.
I don't think it is a deal breaker.
|
|
|
09-03-2016, 09:06 PM
|
#20
|
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Seminole Florida
Posts: 15
|
BBQ I love your argument. what's even cooler is my wife is sitting next to me as I read it aloud. we had a Duramax truck and pulled a trailer,,,, yuk!. she likes power and gas milage and does all the driving... wish they put a Duramax engine in a Class B. thanks for your input!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|